Thieves ram-raid Chanel store in Paris

Thieves ram-raid Chanel store in Paris
A police officer cordons off a street after a Chanel boutique was attacked with a ram car by a team of escaped robbers on June 10, 2024. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 10 June 2024
Follow

Thieves ram-raid Chanel store in Paris

Thieves ram-raid Chanel store in Paris
  • The smash-and-grab took place at around 5:15 a.m. on Avenue Montaigne
  • The loss is estimated at between $6.5 million and $10.8 million

PARIS: Several thieves used a car early Monday morning to ram-raid a Chanel store near the Champs-Elysees avenue in Paris before setting it on fire and fleeing in another vehicle, a police source said.
The smash-and-grab took place at around 5:15 a.m. on Avenue Montaigne, according to the police source, who added that the extent of the damage had yet to be determined.
“The individuals used a first vehicle to enter the establishment, smashing the window, before fleeing in a second vehicle, taking some of the shop’s merchandise with them,” the source added.
The criminals set fire to the ram car before fleeing, but firefighters brought the blaze under control, the police source said.
According to a source close to the case, four people are suspected of having taken part in the attack.
The value of damage and losses was being assessed, the public prosecutor said.
In May, robbers armed with a long weapon snatched jewels from the Harry Winston shop near the Champs-Elysees before making their escape on motorbikes.
The suspects are still at large, and the loss is estimated at between $6.5 million and $10.8 million (six million and 10 million euros), according to a source close to the investigation.
In the northern French city of Lille, thieves repeatedly ram-raided luxury stores to steal handbags and other valuables last year.


Arab Americans for Trump changes name after president’s Gaza comments

Arab Americans for Trump changes name after president’s Gaza comments
Updated 19 sec ago
Follow

Arab Americans for Trump changes name after president’s Gaza comments

Arab Americans for Trump changes name after president’s Gaza comments
  • AAFT changes name to Arab Americans for Peace to lobby Trump to bring about “lasting peace” based on two-state solution
  • Group opposes any proposal to relocate Palestinians to neighboring countries or to convert Gaza into a regional resort

CHICAGO: The chairman of Arab Americans for Trump told Arab News on Thursday that Donald Trump’s statements about taking over Gaza are “political rhetoric,” and that the US president is committed to a peaceful settlement between Israelis and Palestinians.

Dr. Bishara Bahbah said AAFT has changed its name to Arab Americans for Peace to lobby the Trump administration to bring about “lasting peace” based on the two-state solution.

He added that the group opposes any proposal to relocate Palestinians to neighboring countries or to convert Gaza into a regional resort. 

“We appreciate the president’s offer to clean and rebuild Gaza. However, the purpose should be to make Gaza habitable for Palestinians and no one else,” Bahbah said.

“The Palestine that we envision is one that would be on lands occupied by Israel in 1967: the West Bank, Gaza, and East Jerusalem as its capital.”

Bahbah brushed aside Trump’s Gaza comments as a style of American politics in which politicians toss out ideas to kick-start public debate.

“Trump promised specifically to us as a community to bring an end to the wars and an end to the killings of civilians,” he said.

“Secondly, Trump promised to bring about a lasting peace in the Middle East that’s satisfactory to all parties.

“He delivered on the ceasefire and sent back (special envoy to the Middle East) Steve Witkoff in order to ensure that the second phase of the ceasefire goes into effect.”

Bahbah, who met with Trump and several advisers during his election campaign, added: “The ceasefire was a major win for us because we were pleading as a community with the Biden administration to push the Israelis to accept a ceasefire, but clearly President (Joe) Biden and his top lieutenants weren’t pushing the Israelis hard enough.

“President Trump knew how to do it, and from our perspective, that was a big thank you to our community for our vote in supporting the president’s election.”

Regarding Trump’s suggestions that Egypt and Jordan take in Gazans, Bahbah said: “One has to be realistic. Why would Jordan and Egypt bear the brunt of Palestinian refugees when the Israelis were the cause of the Palestinians in Gaza becoming refugees and they caused the destruction of Gaza?”

Bahbah noted that Israel’s actions in Gaza were “funded and supported” by the Biden administration.

“Yes, the Israelis could retaliate for what Hamas did on Oct. 7 (2023), but not in a manner that demolishes 90 percent of the Gaza Strip.

“That’s way over the top. The Israelis have been brought to the International Court of Justice over this particular issue.”


Groups representing federal workers file suit to stop Trump’s shutdown of USAID

Groups representing federal workers file suit to stop Trump’s shutdown of USAID
Updated 07 February 2025
Follow

Groups representing federal workers file suit to stop Trump’s shutdown of USAID

Groups representing federal workers file suit to stop Trump’s shutdown of USAID
  • Lawsuit says President Trump lacks the authority to shut down an agency enshrined in congressional legislation
  • It asks the federal court in Washington to compel the reopening of USAID’s buildings, return its staffers to work and restore funding

WASHINGTON: Federal workers associations filed suit late Thursday asking a federal court to stop the Trump administration’s “effective dismantling” of the lead US aid agency.
The lawsuit by the American Foreign Service Association and the American Federation of Government Employees comes as the new Trump administration and ally Elon Musk are targeting the US Agency for International Development for eradication, freezing its funds and placing almost all of its workers on leave or furlough.
The lawsuit says President Donald Trump lacks the authority to shut down an agency enshrined in congressional legislation. It asks the federal court in Washington to compel the reopening of USAID’s buildings, return its staffers to work and restore funding.

Earlier in the day, the Trump administration presented a plan to dramatically cut staffing worldwide for US aid projects as part of its dismantling of the USAID, leaving fewer than 300 workers out of thousands.
Two current USAID employees and one former senior USAID official told The Associated Press of the administration’s plan, presented to remaining senior officials of the agency Thursday. They spoke on condition of anonymity amid a Trump administration order barring USAID staffers from talking to anyone outside their agency.
The plan would leave fewer than 300 staffers on the job out of what are currently 8,000 direct-hires and contractors. They, along with an unknown number of 5,000 locally hired international staffers abroad, would run the few life-saving programs that the administration says it intends to keep going for the time being.
It was not immediately clear whether the reduction to 300 would be permanent or temporary, potentially allowing more workers to return after what the Trump administration says is a review of which aid and development programs it wants to resume.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio said during a trip to the Dominican Republic that the US government will continue providing foreign aid.
“But it is going to be foreign aid that makes sense and is aligned with our national interest,” he told reporters.
The Trump administration and billionaire ally Elon Musk, who is running a budget-cutting Department of Government Efficiency, have targeted USAID hardest so far in an unprecedented challenge of the federal government and many of its programs.
Since President Donald Trump’s Jan. 20 inauguration, a sweeping funding freeze has shut down most of the agency’s programs worldwide, and almost all of its workers have been placed on administrative leave or furloughed. Musk and Trump have spoken of eliminating USAID as an independent agency and moving surviving programs under the State Department.
Democratic lawmakers and others call the move illegal without congressional approval.
 


Trump signs order imposing sanctions on International Criminal Court over investigations of Israel

Trump signs order imposing sanctions on International Criminal Court over investigations of Israel
Updated 07 February 2025
Follow

Trump signs order imposing sanctions on International Criminal Court over investigations of Israel

Trump signs order imposing sanctions on International Criminal Court over investigations of Israel
  • Actions may include blocking property and assets and not allowing ICC officials, employees and relatives to enter the US
  • Human rights activists said sanctioning court officials would have a chilling effect and run counter to US interests in other conflict zones

WASHINGTON: President Donald Trump on Thursday signed an executive order imposing sanctions on the International Criminal Court over investigations of Israel, a close US ally.
Neither the US nor Israel is a member of or recognizes the court, which has issued an arrest warrant for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for alleged war crimes over his military response in Gaza after the Hamas attack against Israel in October 2023. Tens of thousands of Palestinians, including children, have been killed during the Israeli military’s response.
The order Trump signed accuses the ICC of engaging in “illegitimate and baseless actions targeting America and our close ally Israel” and of abusing its power by issuing “baseless arrest warrants” against Netanyahu and his former defense minister, Yoav Gallant.
“The ICC has no jurisdiction over the United States or Israel,” the order states, adding that the court had set a “dangerous precedent” with its actions against both countries.
Trump’s action came as Netanyahu was visiting Washington. He and Trump held talks Tuesday at the White House, and Netanyahu spent some of Thursday meeting with lawmakers on Capitol Hill.
The order says the US will impose “tangible and significant consequences” on those responsible for the ICC’s “transgressions.” Actions may include blocking property and assets and not allowing ICC officials, employees and relatives to enter the United States.
Human rights activists said sanctioning court officials would have a chilling effect and run counter to US interests in other conflict zones where the court is investigating.
“Victims of human rights abuses around the world turn to the International Criminal Court when they have nowhere else to go, and President Trump’s executive order will make it harder for them to find justice,” said Charlie Hogle, staff attorney with American Civil Liberties Union’s National Security Project. “The order also raises serious First Amendment concerns because it puts people in the United States at risk of harsh penalties for helping the court identify and investigate atrocities committed anywhere, by anyone.”
Hogle said the order “is an attack on both accountability and free speech.”
“You can disagree with the court and the way it operates, but this is beyond the pale,” Sarah Yager, Washington director of Human Rights Watch, said in an interview prior to the announcement.
Like Israel, the US is not among the court’s 124 members and has long harbored suspicions that a “Global Court” of unelected judges could arbitrarily prosecute US officials. A 2002 law authorizes the Pentagon to liberate any American or US ally held by the court. In 2020, Trump sanctioned chief prosecutor Karim Khan’s predecessor, Fatou Bensouda, over her decision to open an inquiry into war crimes committed by all sides, including the US, in Afghanistan.
However, those sanctions were lifted under President Joe Biden, and the US began to tepidly cooperate with the tribunal — especially after Khan in 2023 charged Russian President Vladimir Putin with war crimes in Ukraine.
Driving that turnaround was Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., who organized meetings in Washington, New York and Europe between Khan and GOP lawmakers who have been among the court’s fiercest critics.
Now, Graham says he feels betrayed by Khan — and is vowing to crush the court as well as the economy of any country that tries to enforce the arrest warrant against Netanyahu.
“This is a rogue court. This is a kangaroo court,” Graham said in an interview in December. “There are places where the court makes perfect sense. Russia is a failed state. People fall out of windows. But I never in my wildest dreams imagined they would go after Israel, which has one of the most independent legal systems on the planet.”
“The legal theory they’re using against Israel has no limits and we’re next,” he added.
Biden had called the warrants an abomination, and Trump’s national security adviser, Mike Waltz, has accused the court of having an antisemitic bias.
Any sanctions could cripple the court by making it harder for its investigators to travel and by compromising US-developed technology to safeguard evidence. The court last year suffered a major cyberattack that left employees unable to access files for weeks.
Some European countries are pushing back. The Netherlands, in a statement late last year, called on other ICC members “to cooperate to mitigate risks of these possible sanctions, so that the court can continue to carry out its work and fulfil its mandate.”

 


13 states to sue over DOGE access to government payment systems containing personal data

13 states to sue over DOGE access to government payment systems containing personal data
Updated 07 February 2025
Follow

13 states to sue over DOGE access to government payment systems containing personal data

13 states to sue over DOGE access to government payment systems containing personal data
  • DOGE recently gained access to sensitive payment data within the Treasury Department

Democratic attorneys general in several states vowed Thursday to file a lawsuit to stop Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency from accessing federal payment systems containing Americans’ sensitive personal information.
Thirteen attorneys general, including New York’s Letitia James, said in a statement that they were taking action “in defense of our Constitution, our right to privacy, and the essential funding that individuals and communities nationwide are counting on.”
“As the richest man in the world, Elon Musk is not used to being told ‘no,’ but in our country, no one is above the law,” the statement said. “The President does not have the power to give away our private information to anyone he chooses, and he cannot cut federal payments approved by Congress.”
The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment Thursday afternoon.
Government officials and labor unions have been among those raising concerns about DOGE’s involvement with the payment system for the federal government, saying it could lead to security risks or missed payments for programs such as Social Security and Medicare.
Also Thursday, a federal judge ordered that two Musk allies have “read only” access to Treasury Department payment systems, but no one else will get access for now, including Musk himself. The ruling came in a lawsuit filed by federal workers unions trying to stop DOGE from following through on what they call a massive privacy invasion.
It was not immediately clear when the Democratic attorneys general will file their lawsuit.
Joining James in the statement were the attorneys general of Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, Maryland, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, Rhode Island and Vermont.
President Donald Trump tapped Musk, the world’s richest man, to shrink the size of the US government.
Democrats have criticized the tech billionaire’s maneuvers, which include the hostile seizure of taxpayer data and the apparent closure of the government’s leading international humanitarian aid agency.
DOGE recently gained access to sensitive payment data within the Treasury Department after Treasury’s acting Deputy Secretary David Lebryk resigned under pressure.
“This level of access for unauthorized individuals is unlawful, unprecedented, and unacceptable,” the attorneys general said. “DOGE has no authority to access this information, which they explicitly sought in order to block critical payments that millions of Americans rely on — payments that support health care, childcare, and other essential programs.”
Democratic members of Congress have expressed similar concerns that Musk, an unelected citizen, wields too much power within the US government and states blatantly on his social media platform X that DOGE will shut down payments to organizations.
Musk has made fun of the criticism of DOGE on X while saying it is saving taxpayers millions of dollars.
DOGE officials sought access to the Treasury payment system to stop money from flowing into the US Agency for International Development, according to two people familiar with the matter. That effort undermines assurances the department has given that it only sought to review the integrity of the payments and had “read-only access” to the system as part of an audit process.
The two people familiar with the matter spoke Thursday to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity for fear of retaliation.


Trump meets with congressional Republicans as GOP lawmakers argue over tax and spending cuts

Trump meets with congressional Republicans as GOP lawmakers argue over tax and spending cuts
Updated 07 February 2025
Follow

Trump meets with congressional Republicans as GOP lawmakers argue over tax and spending cuts

Trump meets with congressional Republicans as GOP lawmakers argue over tax and spending cuts
  • The standoff is creating frustration for Republicans as precious time is slipping and they fail to make progress on what has been their top priority

WASHINGTON: President Donald Trump hosted an unusually long meeting with House Republicans at the White House on Thursday, turning over prime workspace for them to hammer out differences over the size, scope and details of their multi-trillion plan to cut taxes, regulations and government spending.
Trump set the tone at the start of the five-hour session, lawmakers said, then left them alone for a meeting that ran so long that Speaker Mike Johnson missed his own one-on-one at the US Capitol with the Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who instead met with Democratic leaders and other lawmakers as the speaker’s office scrambled to reschedule.
“Very positive developments today,” Johnson said once he returned to the Capitol. “We’re really grateful to the president for leaning in and doing what he does best, and that is put a steady hand at the wheel and get everybody working.”
House and Senate GOP leaders have been desperately looking to Trump for direction on how to proceed on their budget bill, but so far the president has been noncommittal about the details — only pushing Congress for results.
The standoff is creating frustration for Republicans as precious time is slipping and they fail to make progress on what has been their top priority with their party in control in Washington. At the same time, congressional phone lines are being swamped with callers protesting Trump’s cost-cutting efforts led by billionaire Elon Musk against federal programs, services and operations.
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters the president and lawmakers were discussing “tax priorities of the Trump administration,” including Trump’s promises to end federal taxation of tips, Social Security benefits and overtime pay. Renewing tax cuts Trump enacted in 2017 also was on the agenda, she said.
“The president is committed to working with Congress to get this done,” Leavitt said.
Johnson, despite the slimmest of majorities, has insisted Republicans will stay unified and on track to deliver on his goal of House passage of the legislation by April.
The chair of the House Budget Committee, Texas Rep. Jodey Arrington, returned from the meeting saying his panel will hold hearings on the package next week.
But as Johnson’s timeline slips — the House was hoping to start budget hearings this week — the Senate is making moves to take charge. GOP senators are heading to Trump’s private Mar-a-Lago club on Friday for their own meeting.
Republicans led by Senate Majority Leader John Thune of South Dakota have proposed a two-step approach, starting with a smaller bill that would include money for Trump’s US-Mexico border wall and deportation plans, among other priorities. They later would pursue the more robust package of tax break extensions before a year-end deadline.
Sen. Lindsey Graham, chairman of the Senate Budget Committee, announced late Wednesday that he was pushing ahead next week with hearings to kickstart the process.
The dueling approaches between the House and Senate is becoming something of a race to see which chamber will make the most progress toward the GOP’s overall goals.
The House GOP largely wants what Trump has called a “big, beautiful bill” that would extend some $3 trillion in tax cuts that expire at the end of the year, and include a list of other GOP priorities, including funding for the president’s mass deportation effort and promised US-Mexico border wall. It include massive cuts from a menu of government programs — from health care to food assistance — to help offset the tax cuts.
The smaller bill Graham is proposing would total some $300 billion and include border money and a boost in defense spending, largely paid for with a rollback of Biden-era green energy programs.
Graham, R-S.C., said that would give the Trump administration the money it needs to “finish the wall, hire ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) agents to deport criminal illegal immigrants.”
“This will be the most transformational border security bill in the history of our country,” Graham said.
House Republicans are deeply split over Graham’s approach. But they are also at odds over their own ideas.
House GOP leaders are proposing cuts that would bring $1 trillion in savings over the decade, lawmakers said, but members of the conservative House Freedom Caucus want at least double that amount.
Rep. Chip Roy, R-Texas, said he’s looking for $2.5 trillion in spending cuts over 10 years, or $250 billion annually, as part of that plan, compared to a $1 trillion floor over 10 years that some in GOP leadership have discussed.
Roy and other members of the Freedom Caucus are interested in Graham’s approach, which is seen as a down payment on Trump’s immigration and deportation plans, while the party continues work on the broader tax and spending cuts package.
But Arrington, the House Budget Committee chair, has previously said the $2.5 trillion in spending reductions was a “stretch goal.”
Johnson, R-Louisiana, needs almost complete unanimity from his ranks to pass any bill over objections from Democrats. In the Senate, Republicans have a 53-47 majority, with little room for dissent.
Trump has repeatedly said he is less wed to the process used in Congress than the outcome of achieving his policy goals.